Power in US and renewables (primarily for US audiences) (v1.0)

This subject is best written as a country specific essay. 

Power generation in US today consumes a lot of fossil fuels. 25% of US greenhouse gas emissions is due to the electric power sector.

 --------

Oahu, my home's, renewable experience is interesting. It shut down its last coal plant but has traditionally relied heavily on petroleum for electric generation. Because this must be shipped to the middle of the pacific and because of its isolated island grids, electric prices are high (32.47 cents per KWh). It has shifted a sizable portion of its generation to renewables (31% to 33% of Oahu as well as Hawaii's electricity is from renewables).  Tax benefits have encouraged a lot of homes to add solar to their roofs also.

But there have been power blackouts on occasion. This may be because a lot of this power generation is susceptible to the vagaries of nature. This highlights the need for a mix of power sources that include sources not susceptible to the vagaries of nature like waste to energy, biodiesel and biofuel. The big island also gets some of its power from geothermal. Unfortunately, Hydroelectric is not really an option because there are no decent rivers on Oahu. Hawaii has also invested early in battery-based Grid energy storage which stabilizes the Grid and enhances Grid reliability and resilience. It is also looking at grid modernization strategy including smart grid. 

The key focus of Hawaii is the three R’s. reliability (light comes on when you turn on the switch), Reasonable (price should be acceptable to the market), and Renewable. I believe the price will come down as more and more electricity is generated from renewables. Hawaii has a goal of 100% electricity from renewables and is making steady progress.  Also, the rate at which the transition occurs should be carefully planned.

So, the key principles for renewable success are: 

  • The three R’s
  • The power source Mix
  • The transition rate.
  • Grid storage.

--------

Other states aggressively pursuing renewables are CA, TX, ID, WA, SD, VT, OR, ME. Both Texas and California are expanding the most rapidly in solar and storage. 

Let us look at the 2022 statistics of these states.

Vermont: 99.6% from renewables. 2.2 TWh.

South Dakota: 81.4% from renewables. 14.6 TWh.

Washington: 75.7% from renewables. 88.4 TWh.

Idaho: 73% from renewables. 11.9 TWh.

Hawaii: 33% from renewables. 1.8 TWh.

California: 43% from renewables. 87.4 TWh.

Texas: 26.5% from renewables. 139.3 TWh.

Oregon: 68.9% from renewables. 42.2 TWh.

Iowa: 64.9% from renewables. 47.4 TWh.

Maine: 62.9% from renewables. 8 TWh.

In total these states together generate about 25% of all US electricity, and 50% of all renewables.

Avg cost of electricity in US is about 15.45 cents per KWh.

Avg cost of electricity in SD is about 12.37 cents per KWh.

Avg cost of electricity in Vermont is about 21.12 cents per KWh (I think primarily because the utilities are tightly regulated).

Here is a list of states by renewable percent (Hawaii seems to have increased from 19% then to 33% today?). 


--------

Where a State/Territory is currently, depends a lot on where they started from, and the state policies adopted.  

Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) require that a specified percentage of the electricity utilities sell comes from renewable resources. States have created these standards to diversify their energy resources, promote domestic energy production and encourage economic development. 

Renewable energy policies help drive the nation’s $269 billion market as of 2022, for wind, solar and other renewable energy sources. These policies can play an integral role in state efforts to diversify their energy mix, promote economic development and reduce emissions. Roughly half of the growth in U.S. renewable energy generation since the beginning of the 2000s can be attributed to state renewable energy policies.

The states and territories with renewable portfolio standards are HI, WA, OR, CA, TX, ME, VT, NV, AZ, CO, NM, MN, IL, MO, MI, OH, MD, VA, PA, DE, NJ, NY, DC, CT, MA, NH, RI,  PR, VI.

The states and territories with voluntary renewable energy standards and targets are UT, IN, SC, GU. 

The states and territories with expired goals are ND, WI, SD, IA, KS, OK, MP. (does not mean they don't have renewable efforts!)

The states and territories without any are AK, MT, ID, WY, NE, KY, WV, AR, TN, LA, MS, AL, GA, FL, AS. (does not mean they don't have renewable efforts!)

--------

Besides Vermont in US which generates 99% from renewables, the following countries generate at least 99% from renewables - Ethiopia, Bhutan, Nepal, Paraguay, Iceland, Costa Rica, Lesotho, South Georgia, Albania, Eswatini, Norway, and DR Congo. So, it is achievable!! 

China produces 31% of total global renewable electricity followed by the US (11%), Brazil (6.4%), Canada (5.4%), and India (3.9%). Russia, Japan and Germany also contribute a significant amount.  

--------

Market forces in US are generally favorable for renewables. Prices are coming down and power output efficiency is going up. The power transition is playing out with new producers coming online with renewables or much less damaging energy source, and older producers bowing out due to lack of competitiveness or inability to comply with regulation or refurbishing themselves given appropriate incentives or regulatory pressure to switch to renewables or a less damaging energy source. Natural gas for example has half the greenhouse emissions of coal per unit energy. Rhode Island (83%) and Delaware (87%) for example today generate the vast majority of its energy from natural gas but both are committed to 100% clean energy in the future. 

--------

Nuclear Fusion seems far off, but I don't think people should rule out new nuclear fission plants out of hand despite some definite negatives to them (like the possibility of a Fukushima like disaster and disposal of radioactive wastes). These are like renewables since no greenhouse gas is emitted and is considered clean energy. It is provided by 92 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 94.7 GW, with 61 pressurized water reactors. In 2019, they produced a total of 809.41 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for 20% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2018, nuclear comprised nearly 50 percent of US emission-free energy generation. In 2024 generation is on average 65 terawatt-hours per month. But nuclear is expensive to operate and build so must be judicious about where and when to deploy it, and when to crank it up, operate at reduced capacity, or operate at full capacity. But nuclear can be very good for baseload electricity. 

I read this today Jun 9, 2024 - "The White House on Wednesday plans to announce new measures to support the development of new U.S. nuclear power plants, a large potential source of carbon-free electricity the government says is needed to combat climate change.". This was coupled with the biggest clean energy bill, to go on a nuclear power spree, which just passed, ending decades of inactivity there. 



--------

States/Territories that have committed to 100% clean energy are: CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OR, PR, DC, RI, VA, WA, and WI. 


In 2022, 40.6% of the US electricity mix came from clean energy sources, marking an all-time high. This includes windhydroelectric, and solar power, as well as nuclear (which is not renewable but emits no greenhouse gases and is clean energy). While natural gas remained the largest source of electricity, contributing 39.4%, coal-fired generation fell to 19.4%. Wind led the way among renewables, followed by hydroelectric power and solar power. Additionally in 2020, the US generated 834 million megawatt hours of electricity from renewables, making it a record year for green energy. 

Here are three useful charts. 








    


In the future the rise of AI which demands huge amounts of power will require more power generation. Tech companies are already facing challenges. 



--------

For climate mitigation, I think states have one of four choices. 

  • Throttle demand with price increases but then inflation may pick up.
  • Throttle demand with regulation but then the economy may be smothered. 
  • Invest in almost all electricity to come from renewables or clean sources which has no or low carbon footprint. 
  • Allow some nonclean energy and hope to offset it.  

You could consider installing rooftop solar. Grassroot support makes it easier for state government to roll out renewables. In the future, if not almost fully powered with renewables or clean energy in your state, and the carbon sinks allocated and carbon credits purchased by your state are not enough to offset emissions, you can cut demand. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

List of all material on climate change and appeal for help (v1.2)

Met5: The Earth's Energy Budget (v1.0)